Skip to main content

Table 2 Treatment characteristics at each HIFU session

From: Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of breast fibroadenoma

 

Group 1 (n = 19)

Group 2 (n = 7)

 

1st HIFU

1st HIFU

2nd HIFU

Treated volume (mL), median (range)

0.78 (0.35–2.24)a

2.66 (0.52–3.01)

1.34 (0.65–2.24)

Treated volume (%), mean ± SD

56.96 ± 25.05

36.02 ± 7.92b

58.50 ± 22.34

Total delivered energy (kJ), median (range)

10.1 (4.4–25.4)c

27.7 (7.4–39.6)

16.5 (12.8–31.4)

Energy per treated volume (kJ/mL), median, range

12.4 (6.7–14.3)

13.0 (10.4–14.2)

13.9 (7.1–14.8)

Treatment duration (min) mean ± SD

60.6 ± 22.8d

105.1 ± 38.8

66.3 ± 15.7

Number of treated sites, median (range)

58 (29–149)e

179 (38–221)

95 (40–153)

Hyperechoic marks (%), median (range)

15 (0–31)

10 (0–29)

7 (0–50)

  1. a p < 0.05 compared with group 2 at the 1st HIFU and group 2 at the 2nd HIFU, Mann-Whitney U test, b p < 0.05 compared with group 1 and group 2 at the 2nd HIFU, Student’s t-test, c p < 0.01 compared with group 2 at the 1st HIFU and group 2 at the 2nd HIFU, Mann-Whitney U test, d p < 0.001 compared with group 2 at the 1st HIFU, Student’s t-test, e p < 0.05 compared with group 2 at the 1st HIFU, Mann-Whitney U test