Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound

Fig. 6

From: Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model

Fig. 6

Treatment impact for different acoustic pressures. Here included a macrolesion volume, b length of macrolesion, and c radius of macrolesion for groups exposed under 2.0 MPa (G), 2.8 MPa (H), and 4.0 MPa (D). Simulations were done for a mean radius of acoustic field above the lesion formation pressure threshold of 2.0 MPa (PRPA). Macrolesion volumes appear positively related to acoustic pressure, where contributions come from the radial direction while the axial sizes are insignificantly different

Back to article page