Skip to main content

Table 2 A comparison of treatment, complications and efficacy between different HIFU studies

From: High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules – a systematic review

First author (year)

No. of nodules

Nodule volume (mL)

Type of device and probe

Total amount of DIAE to each nodule (KJ)

Treatment time (minutes)

Complications

Efficacy (% reduction from baseline)

Esnault (2011) [15]

22

0.5–2.6

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

35–94 J/pulsea

 

Pain, skin burn, cough, blisters

Feasibility study. Ablated nodules were examined on histology after 2 weeks

Korkusuz (2014) [19]

10

Median: 3.19 (range: 0.8–7.67)

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

Median: 8.4 (range: 5.65–12.46)

Not reported

Pain

Not reported

Korkusuz (2015) [21]

9

Median: 3.5 (range: 0.8–7.7)

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

Median: 9.9 (range: 5.7–12.5)

Median: 62 (range: 42–96)

Pain during treatment, reddening of skin

Median: 48.8 (range: 11.4–75.0) at 3-month

Korkusuz (2015) [22]

12

Median: 3.4 (range: 0.6–5.0)

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

-

-

None reported

Median: 55 at 3-month

Kovatcheva (2015) [23, 22]

20

Mean: 4.96 ± 2.79 (range: 1.56–9.35)

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

Mean: 16.4 ± 7.7 (range: 5.5–31.7)

Mean: 86.8 ± 31.7 (range: 37–152)

Subcutaneous edema, skin redness

Mean: 48.7 ± 24.3 at 6-month (after single ablation)

Lang (2017) [24]

22

Mean: 6.98 ± 4.04 (range: 1.68–16.76)

US-guided HIFU/3 MHz extracorporeal probe

Mean: 15.17 ± 6.90 (range 5.88–28.35)

Mean: 75.71 ± 34.20 (range: 48.75 153.25)

Pain, skin redness, minor neck swelling

Mean: 68.87 ± 15.27 at 12-month (following single ablation)

  1. Abbreviations: US- guided HIFU ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound, DIAE depth-independent acoustic energy
  2. aonly power was provided. Total energy was not available