Skip to main content
Fig. 12 | Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound

Fig. 12

From: Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model

Fig. 12

Comparison of treatment impact for different injections sites and ultrasound aiming strategies. Results show a macrolesion volume b and lesion density for two microbubble administration routes, i.e., tail vein (A) versus jugular vein (B) injection; additionally shown are c macrolesion volume and d lesion density for regular aiming (B) and intentionally aiming at the ribs (C). Injection and aiming variations do not significantly differ among the tested groups

Back to article page