Volume 3 Supplement 1

Current and Future Applications of Focused Ultrasound 2014. 4th International Symposium: abstracts

Open Access

Assessing temperature dependence of T1 in cortical bone using ultrashort echo-time MRI

  • Misung Han1,
  • Serena Scott1,
  • Eugene Ozhinsky1,
  • Vasant Salgaonkar1,
  • Peter Jones1,
  • Peder Larson1,
  • Chris Diederich1,
  • Roland Krug1 and
  • Viola Rieke1
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound20153(Suppl 1):P5

DOI: 10.1186/2050-5736-3-S1-P5

Published: 30 June 2015


MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a promising, noninvasive method for treatment of bone tumors and palliation of pain.

During thermal therapy, temperature mapping is necessary to ensure proper heat deposition in targeted tumors as well as to prevent undesired heating in healthy tissues. However, conventional proton resonance frequency-based MR thermometry cannot be applied in cortical bone due to its short T2* relaxation time. Recently, it was shown that ultrashort echo-time MRI can be used to assess T1 change in cortical bone due to temperature change (Han M, ISMRM 2014, P262). This work focused on characterization of temperature dependence of T1 in cortical bone by performing a calibration experiment.


A calibration experiment was conducted using cortical bone samples from diaphysis segments of bovine femurs. Two bone samples were placed in a container filled with circulating water controlled by a water bath. To monitor temperature, fiber optic temperature sensors (Luxtron, LumaSense Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) were placed, with one sensor inside the water bath and one in a bone sample. Imaging was performed at a GE discovery MR750 widebore 3T scanner (GE healthcare, Milwakee, WI) using a 16-channel large flex coil (GE healthcare, Cleveland, OH). Cortical bone T1 was measured at temperatures of approximately 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 70°C during the heating phase and 55, 35, and 25°C during the cooling phase after the cortical bone samples and the water reached thermal equilibrium. For T1 mapping, 3D UTE imaging was performed by incorporating a nonselective hard pulse with a 200 μs duration followed by 3D radial imaging. The scan parameters included a 75 μs TE, 11 ms TR, and 1.7 mm isotropic resolution. To measure T1 using a variable flip angle scheme, UTE imaging was performed at 8° and 44° flip angles, resulting in a total 8 min scan time.

Results and conclusions

Our calibration results are shown in Figs 1-2. Figure 1a-1b shows T1 maps at two different temperatures, 25.1°C and 70.1°C, overlaid on a UTE image. Figure 2a-2b shows average T1 values from regions of interest on twelve slices over temperature values measured from the fiber optic sensor. A linear relationship between temperature and T1 was observed for both bone samples. For the first bone sample, the linear coefficient was 0.77 ms/°C during heating and 0.73 ms/°C during cooling; for the second bone sample, it was 0.73 ms/°C during heating and 0.84 ms/°C during cooling. Although the linear coefficients were not identical for heating and cooling, the T1-temperature plots from the two bone samples indicated reversibility in T1 variation. The variable flip angle method is very sensitive to B1 inhomogeneities and flip angle calibration errors, and thus can result in significant T1 measurement errors. Still, our experiment demonstrated a linear temperature dependence of T1 in cortical bone for a temperature range of 25°C and 70°C. By improving accuracy in T1 measurement, direct quantification of temperature changes in cortical bone could be possible, and thermal dose might be more accurately monitored during thermal ablation of bone tumors.
Figure 1

(a-b) Bone T1 maps at temperatures of 25.1°C and 70.1°C, respectively, overlaid on a UTE image. Regions of interest used for analysis are depicted.

Figure 2

(a-b) T1-temperature plots for two bone samples, respectively. Linear regression lines during heating and cooling are denoted as well.


Acknowledgements (Funding)

The authors acknowledge our funding sources, NIH R01AR057336, NIH R00HL097030, GE healthcare, and InSightec. The authors also thank Dr. Prasheel Lillaney for helping with the use of fiber-optic temperature sensors.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of California at San Francisco


© Han et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.